Good for her.
Good for all of us.
Filed under: Author profiles, authors, Books, self-publishing, Writers
03/01/2011 • 10:28 PM 1
Good for her.
Good for all of us.
Filed under: Author profiles, authors, Books, self-publishing, Writers
03/01/2011 • 4:41 AM 3
There are words you can lose without losing meaning. For example, writers who repeatedly precede statements with “I think” generate in their readers a suspicion of insecurity or uncertainty. Make your assertions, state your arguments, declare your narrative.
Writers have idiosyncrasies. Repeated phrases crop up. As you revise your manuscript, look for them and make a note.
Take the example “my own.” That can — and should — be shortened to “my.” That’s my own business. See? You lose nothing by losing “own.” What you gain is economy with this small edit and your reader will appreciate it (though they won’t know why.) I’m an editor. It’s my own business to know.
When you identify your own idiosycrasies, use the search and replace feature and you’ll find the number of instances of the phrase. You may not want to replace them all. Idiosyncratic phrases can be fine in dialogue.
I think that’s right.
No.
That’s right.
Filed under: Editing, Editors, publishing, Writers, writing tips, edit, editing, editing tip, editor, good tips, Publish, what editors want, Word count, writing tip