Image via Wikipedia
A couple of years ago I put together a chapbook of poetry. A few seconds after I handed a copy to a beta-reader he found a mistake. It was a glaring mistake on the first page he turned to. Alas. Embarrassment is an emotion that can run through you, both hot and cold.
Typos, grammatical errors, consistency problems and a host of other plagues suck the credibility and professionalism from your manuscript. At least for me it was a beta-reader and, contrary to first impressions, the rest of the manuscript emerged clean.
Some writers see self-publishing as a shortcut. When writers treat the medium as the quick and easy path to becoming an author, that’s still vanity publishing.
When you approach it seriously and make sure your manuscript has been combed for problems, that’s publishing (nevermind the “self” part.) When you choose to self-publish, publish. Form a company. Be a publisher. Hire editors (yes, I’m aware of the conflict of interest, but if you are, too—yes, I edit—we’re covered.) Get proofreaders lined up.
Take it seriously and you will be taken seriously.
Related Articles
- Writers: DIY vs traditional publishing (chazzwrites.wordpress.com)
- 10 Biggest Predictions for the Future of Book Publishing (onlinecollege.org)
- Chazz Writes: The Top Post of 2010 was… (chazzwrites.wordpress.com)
Filed under: authors, ebooks, Editing, Editors, getting it done, grammar, publishing, Rant, self-publishing, writing tips, Chapbook, Publish, self-publishing sucks, the difference between self-publishing and vanity press, Vanity press, Writers Resources, writing
